Higher education enrolments and graduate labour market statistics

Introduction

This fact sheet provides information about gender imbalances in Australian higher education, including gender segregation in fields of study and pay inequality in industries after graduation and on entering the workplace.*

This fact sheet classifies fields of study and industries according to their gender dominance using the number of students/employees:


• Female-dominated (60% or more women)
• Male-dominated (40% or less women)
• Mixed (41% to 59% women).

* Note: This factsheet features data from three sources. The 2020 QILT Graduate Outcomes Survey, 2019 Tertiary Enrolment data from the Department of Education, Skills and Employment and WGEA 2020 Graduate Trainee Program data. Each of these sources has a different methodology and the data is the most recent available but covers slightly different time periods. For this reason, it is important to note that the analysis in this factsheet is not comparing data from the different sources.

Covid-19

The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic has had a marked impact on the Australian labour market, and this includes graduate employment outcomes. Between 2019 and 2020, full-time undergraduate employment rates fell from 72.2% to 68.7%.*


It is also likely that the global pandemic and declining graduate employment rates are having an impact on graduate gender pay gaps. In past years, the graduate gender pay gap has been wider than it was in 2020 and this could be progress or it could reflect the fluctuations experienced at large by employees within the Australian economy, including graduates.**

 

* Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching (QILT) (2020), Graduate Outcome Survey National Report, Accessed 04 March 2021, https://www.qilt.edu.au/docs/default-source/gos-reports/2020-gos/2020-gos-national-report.pdf?sfvrsn=be0bec3c_2

** ibid

Higher Education Enrolments

  • Women’s participation in higher education is expanding in Australia. In 2007, women represented 57.6% of enrolled domestic students across all universities or other institutions. By 2019, this had risen to 59.0%.*
  • Despite the increase in female enrolments, women and men continue to follow different educational paths and the pattern of female and male segregation into different industries remains.
  • Gender segregation is where women are dominant in traditionally female fields of study and men are dominant in traditionally male fields. For example, women dominate in areas such as Education, Health, Creative Arts and Society and Culture and men dominate in areas such as Information Technology and Engineering Related Technologies.
  • Domestic enrolments are highly gender segregated. Both male and female dominated fields have low participation rates for the opposite sex. Male participation in female dominated fields ranges from 25-39% whereas female participation in male dominated fields is still lower at between 17-19%.

Table 1 displays the gender segregation of women and men across fields of study. Overall little has changed since 2007, although there have been some notable movements:

  • Overall women’s representation has increased across fields of study, including in the male dominated industries of Information Technology and Engineering and Related Technologies
  • Men’s representation has grown in the Creative Arts and Education which are female dominated fields as well as in, Natural and Physical Sciences and Management and Commerce which are mixed fields
  • Overall, compositional change has been slow, the largest change between 2007 and 2019 was in Agriculture, Environment and Related studies where female participation increased by 5.3 pp. This indicates that gendered norms have continued to influence the choices students are making about what to study over the 12 years of recorded data.**

Note: Over time, median graduate salaries can be subject to volatile changes. Salaries are self-reported and can be influenced by factors such as the number of respondents or economic impacts such as the Covid-19 epidemic. However, there are recurrent patterns within the gender pay gaps which reflect the wider workforce and female median undergraduate salaries are consistently lower than male salaries.

* Department of Education and Training (2020), Higher Education Statistics Data Cube (uCube) , viewed 04 March 2021, available: http://highereducationstatistics.education.gov.au/

** ibid

Table 1: Gender composition of domestic enrolments by field of study, 2007-2019

    2019   Change between 2007 and 2019
Dominance (2017) Field of study Female (%) Male (%) Female (p.p.)
Female Dominated Education 73.9% 26.1% -0.5
  Health 74.4% 25.6% 0.7
  Society & Culture 65.8% 34.2% 1.1
  Creative Arts 63.6% 39.1% -2.6
Mixed Agriculture and Environmental Related Studies 56.1% 43.9% 5.3
  Natural and Physical Sciences 51.1% 48.9% -0.6
  Management and Commerce 47.0% 53.0% -1.2
  Architecture and Building 41.6% 58.4% 1.9
Male Dominated Information Technology 19.2% 80.8% 0.3
  Engineering and Related Technologies 17.9% 82.1% 3.2
Total   59.0% 41.0% 1.4

Source: Department of Education and Training (2019), Higher Education Statistics Data Cube (uCube) . Agency calculations. Total includes Fields of Studies not shown: Food Hospitality and Personal Services, Mixed Field Programs, Non-Award course. Gender composition calculations exclude genders other than male and female.

Higher Education Award Course Completions

The gender composition of higher education award course completions in 2019 shows that a higher proportion of women graduated than men. Women currently represent 60.4 % of all completed undergraduate and postgraduate higher degree courses.

Table 2: Award course completion for domestic undergraduate and postgraduate students by gender, 2007-2019

Award course completion by gender Female Male
2007 59.4% 40.6%
2019 60.4% 39.6%

Source: Department of Education and Training (2020), Higher Education Statistics Data Cube (uCube). Agency calculations. Total includes Fields of Studies not shown: Food Hospitality and Personal Services, Mixed Field Programs, Non-Award course. Gender composition calculations exclude genders other than male and female.

Figure 1 shows the number of students completing award courses by gender:

  • Between 2007 and 2019 , women’s completion rates increased by 1 percent, from 59.4% to 60.4% in favour of women.

Source: Department of Education and Training (2019), Full-Year Award Course Completions, Agency graph
Note: May include students who have requested their gender to be recorded as neither male nor female.

Undergraduate and Postgraduate Employment

The percentage of graduates entering the labour market within four months of leaving university is relatively high (between 80-90%). Table 3 shows a fairly gender-balanced proportion of graduates entering the labour market and that:

  • Full-time employment is higher after postgraduate study (coursework and research).
  • Slightly more women than men entered overall employment after undergraduate study.
  • Slightly more men than women entered full-time employment after postgraduate coursework and postgraduate research.
  • Between 2019 and 2020, full-time undergraduate employment decreased for both males and females (by 3.7 and 3.2 pp respectively). The decline in overall undergraduate employment was narrower, with female employment declining by 1.7 pp and male employment by 1.8 pp between 2019-20.
  • This decline was also present in the postgraduate coursework and research cohorts, with the exception of male research graduates who did not experience a decline in postgraduate employment between 2019-20.

Table 3: Undergraduate and postgraduate employment outcomes (within a year of graduating), 2019-2020

  Undergraduate (3 year degree) 2019   Postgraduate (Coursework) 2019   Postgraduate (Research) 2019   Undergraduate (3 year degree) 2020   Postgraduate (Coursework) 2020   Postgraduate (Research) 2020  
  Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male
Full-time employment 72.2% 72.3% 86.4% 87.8% 80.7% 81.7% 68.5% 69.1% 85 86.7% 79.4% 80.9%
Overall employment 87.9% 84.8% 93.2% 91.7% 91.5% 89.7% 86.2% 83.0% 91.8% 91.2% 90.3% 89.7%

Source: Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching (QILT) (2019- 20 ), Graduate Outcome Survey National Report. Agency graph

Undergraduate gender pay gaps by field of study

This section explores median undergraduate starting salaries and gender pay gaps based on fields of study.*


Gender pay gaps are the difference between the average earnings of women and men in the workforce. They are not the difference between two people being paid differently for the same job.


Gender pay gaps are a measure of women’s overall economic position in the workforce in comparison to men and are the result of the social and economic factors that combine to reduce women’s earning capacity over their lifetime.


Data from 2020 shows that graduate gender pay gaps in favour of men exist in most fields of study:

  • Men’s undergraduate median starting salaries were greater than women’s in 15 out of 19 fields of education.
  • Dentistry had the largest gender pay gap, with men earning 11.9% more than women.
  • Law and Paralegal Studies (7.1%), Business and Management (5.4%) also had large differences in starting salaries.
  • The smallest differences in starting salaries in favour of men were in Nursing (1.8%), Medicine (1.7%), Health Services and Support (1.5%), Creative Arts (1.1%), Computing and Information Systems (0.3%) and Teacher Education (0.1%)
  • In study areas of Pharmacy and Rehabilitation, there is no gender pay gap.
  • The areas of Engineering and Social work had small gender pay gaps in favour of women (-0.9% and -2.9% respectively).
  • A comparison with data from 2019 – 20 shows that some graduate gender pay gaps increased by as much as 5 pp. The following areas experienced large increases:
  • Communication increased from -3.8% in 2019 to 3.7% in 2020
  • Dentistry increased from 5.1% in 2019 to 11.9% in 2020
  • However, there are also some study areas that experienced gender pay gap decreases of more than 5 pp. These were:
  • Architecture and built environment decreased from 15.4% in 2019 to 3.7% in 2020
  • Creative Arts decreased from 8.8% in 2019 to 1.1% in 2020

Declining graduate employment rates due to Covid 19 may be influencing the large increases and decreases in graduate gender pay gaps between 2019 and 2020.

* Data from the National Graduate Outcome Survey, conducted by the Social Research Centre, Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching.

 

Table 4: Undergraduate median full-time salaries and gender pay gaps by study area, 2019-20 (sorted largest to smallest gender pay gaps in favour of men)

Study Area Female 2019 ($) Male 2019 ($) Female 2020 ($) Male 2020 ($) Difference 2019 ($) Difference 2020 ($) GPG 2019 (%) GPG 2020 (%)
Dentistry 84,000 88,500 79,300 90,000 4,500 10,700 5.1% 11.9%
Law and paralegal studies 61,300 67,600 64,000 68,900 6,300 4,900 9.3% 7.1%
Business and management 57,600 60,000 59,100 62,500 2,400 3,400 4.0% 5.4%
Humanities, culture and social sciences 60,000 63,000 61,900 65,000 3,000 3,100 4.8% 4.8%
Science and mathematics 59,900 63,400 62,600 65,400 3,500 2,800 5.5% 4.3%
Architecture and built environment 55,000 65,000 62,600 65,000 10,000 2,400 15.4% 3.7%
Communications 54,800 52,000 55,300 57,400 -2,000 2,100 -3.8% 3.7%
Agriculture and environmental studies 56,200 60,500 60,100 62,300 4,300 2,200 7.1% 3.5%
Psychology 60,000 64,700 62,800 65,000 4,700 2,200 7.3% 3.4%
Nursing 62,600 63,000 64,200 65,400 400 1,200 0.6% 1.8%
Medicine 73,000 73,400 74,000 75,300 400 1,300 0.5% 1.7%
Health services and support 62,600 65,100 65,000 66,000 2,500 1,000 3.8% 1.5%
Creative arts 50,000 54,800 51,600 52,200 4,800 600 8.8% 1.1%
Computing and information systems 63,000 64,600 65,000 65,200 1,600 200 2.5% 0.3%
Teacher education 67,800 68,600 69,900 70,000 800 100 1.2% 0.1%
Pharmacy 48,000 48,000 49,600 49,600 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
Rehabilitation 64,700 65,000 65,000 65,000 300 0 0.5% 0.0%
Engineering 67,000 67,800 70,000 69,400 800 -600 1.2% -0.9%
Social work 67,600 66,700 70,000 68,000 -900 -2,000 -1.3% -2.9%
Veterinary science 55,000 n/a 57,500 n/a - - - -
Tourism, hospitality, personal services, sports and recreation 49,300 n/a n/a n/a - - - -
All study areas 61,500 64,700 63,400 65,000 3,200 1,600 4.9% 2.5%

Source: Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching (QILT) (2020), Graduate Outcome Survey National Report, Agency calculations.

Postgraduate gender pay gap by study area

This section explores median postgraduate salaries and gender pay gaps based on fields of study.*


Postgraduate study is associated with improved employment outcomes. The postgraduate employment rate is higher than the undergraduate rate (see Table 3), and median wages for postgraduates are substantially higher than undergraduate salaries.

Table 5: Postgraduate (coursework) median full-time salaries and gender pay gaps by study area, 2019-20 (sorted largest to smallest gender pay gaps in favour of men)

Study Area Female 2019 ($) Male 2019 ($) Female 2020 ($) Male 2020 ($) Difference 2019 ($) Difference 2020 ($) GPG 2019 (%) GPG 2020 (%)
Agriculture and environmental studies 70,200 85,000 70,000 93,000 14,800 23,000 17.4% 24.7%
Architecture and built environment 63,200 70,000 62,300 77,000 6,800 14,700 9.7% 19.1%
Computing and information systems 89,900 92,900 81,900 100,500 3,000 18,600 3.2% 18.5%
Health services and support 83,500 99,100 83,500 100,000 15,600 16,500 15.7% 16.5%
Science and mathematics 77,000 87,700 83,300 97,000 10,700 13,700 12.2% 14.1%
Business and management 103,000 120,000 104,000 120,000 17,000 16,000 14.2% 13.3%
Law and paralegal studies 71,400 80,000 72,000 80,000 8,600 8,000 10.8% 10.0%
Nursing 85,300 90,000 86,400 93,200 4,700 6,800 5.2% 7.3%
Engineering 80,000 87,500 93,000 100,000 7,500 7,000 8.6% 7.0%
Social work 73,100 77,200 77,000 81,800 4,100 4,800 5.3% 5.9%
Teacher education 83,000 86,000 85,200 90,000 3,000 4,800 3.5% 5.3%
Humanities, culture and social sciences 79,100 84,000 80,300 84,000 4,900 3,700 5.8% 4.4%
Communications 65,000 74,600 70,000 72,000 9,600 2,000 12.9% 2.8%
Psychology 80,000 88,700 83,000 85,000 8,700 2,000 9.8% 2.4%
Medicine 78,000 80,000 78,300 78,500 2,000 200 2.5% 0.3%
Rehabilitation 66,800 71,900 68,900 68,500 5,100 -400 7.1% -0.6%
Pharmacy 75,100 68,900 83,500 n/a -6,200 - -9.0% -
Dentistry 104,000 n/a n/a 114,800 - - - -
Veterinary science 60,000 n/a 59,700 n/a - - - -
Creative Arts 70,000 78,000 65,000 n/a 8,000 - 10.3% -
Tourism, hospitality, personal services, sports and recreation n/a n/a n/a n/a - - - -
All study areas 81,300 95,000 83,500 96,000 13,700 12,500 14.4% 13.0%

* Data from the National Graduate Outcome Survey, conducted by the Social Research Centre, Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching.

Data from 2020 confirms that postgraduate gender pay gaps exist in favour of men in most fields of study. The median overall postgraduate gender pay gap was 13.0%.
Men’s postgraduate median salaries were greater than women’s in 14 out of 21 areas of study:

  • Agriculture and environmental studies had the largest gender pay gaps in favour of men (24.7%).
  • Architecture and Built Environment (19.1%), Computing and Information Systems (18.5%), Health Services and Support (16.5%), Science and Mathematics(14.1%) and Business Management (13.8%) also had large gender pay gaps in favour of men.
  • The study areas with the lowest gender pay gaps in favour of men were Communications (2.8%), Psychology (2.4%), and Medicine (0.3%).
  • Rehabilitation have gender pay gaps in favour of women (-0.6%)).

A comparison with data from 2019 – 20 shows the graduate gender pay gap has increased by 5 pp in the
following areas:

  • Agriculture and environment studies increased from 17.4% in 2019 to 24.7% in 2020.
  • Architecture and built environment increased from 9.7% in 2019 to 19.1% in 2020.
  • Computing and information systems increased from 3.2% in 2019 to 18.5%.

There are also some study areas that experienced decreases of more than 5 pp:

  • Communication decreased from 12.9% in 2019 to 2.8% in 2020.
  • Psychology decreased from 9.8% in 2019 to 2.4% in 2020.
  • Rehabilitation decreased from 7.1% in 2019 to -0.6% in 2020.

Graduate trainee program gender pay gap by industry

The Agency’s data set classifies ‘graduates trainees’ as anyone employed in a formal graduate program (a structured program usually within larger business and government organisations offering a mix of on-the-job training and formal learning) and does not refer to individuals who have recently graduated from a tertiary education institution.


The starting total remuneration for graduate trainees reveals differences across industries:

  • The average total remuneration gender pay gap for graduate trainees is 3.7% in favour of men.
  • Retail Trade has a comparatively large total remuneration gender pay gap in favour of women (-7.1%).
  • Within the WGEA sample there are 7% more male graduates ( 8,248) in a formal graduate program than female graduates (7,181).

The following three industries have the largest total remuneration gender pay gaps in favour of men:

  • Accommodation and Food Services (12.1%).
  • Public Administration and Safety (10.3%).
  • Administrative and Support Services (10.0%).

There are also a number of industries that have gender pay gaps in favour of women:

  •  Base salary gender pay gaps in favour of women: Construction (-5.1%), Transport Postal and Warehousing (-3.9%) and Information Media and Telecommunications (-3.5%) and,
  • Total remuneration gender pay gaps in favour of women: Retail Trade (-7.1%), Information Media and
  • Telecommunication (-5.0%), Construction (-4.9), and Transport, Postal and Warehousing (-3.8%).*

* Total remuneration includes base salary, superannuation, performance pay, bonuses, allowances and other discretionary pay.

Table 6: Median remuneration and gender pay gaps for professional graduates by industry, 2019-20*

Industry Women ($) Men ($) GPG (%)
Accommodation and Food Services 57,719 65,700 12.1
Public Administration and Safety 63,027 70,245 10.3
Administrative and Support Services 65,691 73,000 10
Financial and Insurance Services 72,444 80,067 9.5
Professional, Scientific and Technical Services 65,198 68,000 4.1
Education and Training 76,400 79,481 3.9
Healthcare and Social Assistance 83,715 84,949 1.5
Manufacturing 78,650 78,752 0.1
Rental, Hiring and Real Estate Services 67,500 67,500 0
Wholesale Trade 74,997 74,925 -0.1
Mining 113,970 113,380 -0.5
Transport, Postal and Warehousing 71,000 68,412 -3.8
Construction 82,135 78,310 -4.9
Information, Media and Telecommunications 74,769 71,175 -5
Retail Trade 82,125 76,650 -7.1
Other Services - - -
Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing - - -
Arts and Recreation Services - - -

Source: WGEA, 2019-2020 Dataset.
*Instances with less than 15 employee units have not been included and are represented by (-)

Conclusion

While more women than men graduate from higher education institutions and receive the same education as men, women continue to be undervalued in the majority of study fields and industries from the start of their career. The data confirms stark graduate and postgraduate gender pay gaps across the majority of study fields and industries in Australia.

In the most recent data, we have also seen that the changing economic landscape during the Covid-19 pandemic has affected graduate employment rates. Furthermore, the average gender pay gaps across all study fields for undergraduates entering the workforce has declined. This is possibly due to progress on gender equality, but could also be due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In economic terms, lower salaries mean that women receive lower rewards from investing in their tertiary education than men.

Downloadable PDF